Subscribe

Worksite Health Centers Can Help Employees Manage Cancer

Cancer costs employers an estimated $93 billion annually in direct costs, $18.8 billion from lost productivity
VBCC - June 2014 Vol 5, No 5 - AVBCC 2014 4th Annual Conference
Wayne Kuznar

Los Angeles, CA—Worksite health centers can improve the quality and effectiveness of cancer treatment for employees while reducing costs for their employers.

Although they do not have specific cancer expertise, onsite health centers can support primary and specialty physicians in multiple ways, including navigation through an often fragmented treatment process, coordination of procedures, and monitoring, said Larry S. Boress, President and Chief Executive Health Officer, Midwest Business Group on Health, and Executive Director, National Association of Worksite Health Centers, at the Fourth Annual Conference of the Association for Value-Based Cancer Care.

Economic Burden on Employers
The impact of cancer on employers in monetary terms is conservatively estimated at $93 billion annually in direct costs and $18.8 billion from lost productivity. Because cancer is one of the most costly medical conditions, employers are looking for ways to improve traditional treatment methods, Mr Boress said.

Cancer treatment can translate into increased employer cost in the form of employee absenteeism, loss of productivity, and loss of health, and affects caregivers as well, said Mr Boress. Productivity decreases as much as 25% among employees who are acting as caregivers for family members with cancer.

Onsite Cancer Care Services
Mr Boress enumerated the benefits of onsite centers and, more specifically, how employers are utilizing them in an effort to help manage cancer care. Some employers are utilizing onsite health centers to support employees with cancer.

“We find that about 30% of companies of all different sizes have some form of onsite health services,” Mr Boress noted. These may be onsite, near-site, or mobile health programs. Some centers are large enough to serve several thousand employees, although many are much smaller.

The services employers provide vary greatly, ranging from only pharmacy services to full healthcare facilities with primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, imaging and infusion services, physical therapy, and more (Table).

The objectives of onsite health centers include improving employee health, increasing productivity and reducing absenteeism, offering occupational health and safety services, and increasing the effectiveness of health promotion efforts. Improving integration of health management efforts and reducing overall medical costs are other primary aims.

The ability to coordinate and collaborate care management, consolidate data, and improve visibility and access to services makes it possible for worksite health centers to achieve these goals. Onsite centers are capable of integrating worksite programs, providing easy access to services, and improving support for patient self-management.

Companies from highly diverse industries are developing worksite health centers. “They’re doing it, clearly, to improve the health of the population,” Mr Boress said. “What many of these employers have done is a reaction to the local health system not meeting their needs in access, quality, cost, and effectiveness. Also, they want to reduce their cost.”

Reducing productivity losses is an effective way to reduce costs. When an employee leaves work for a medical service or to visit the pharmacy, the employee is typically gone for 3 to 4 hours. “If you offer these services onsite, the employee can often be back in 30 minutes. It makes a huge difference in productivity and many employers are focusing on that,” said Mr Boress.

Addressing Fragmented Care
A lack of cost and outcomes transparency for cancer treatments and providers makes choosing appropriate options confusing for patients. According to a 2007 Commonwealth Fund study, many cancer therapies that can increase the chance of survival are not received by patients because of a lack of communication between doctors and patients. “Lack of communication, lack of interaction, lack of record-keeping and sharing, lack of a team approach have caused all kinds of problems,” said Mr Boress.

Adding to the confusion is the fragmentation of care that occurs with cancer treatment. After diagnosis, patients are usually sent to oncologists, undergo various tests, then treatments, return to their doctors for evaluation, and perhaps attend support groups. This care is often not coordinated. “The whole maze of uncoordinated care and providers causes lost time and productivity and confusion in general,” said Mr Boress.

Worksite health centers have the capabilities to address these cancer-related issues. These centers can offer cancer screening and prevention programs. They can provide support and assist in managing and coordinating care once an employee is diagnosed. “They can be the navigator to help them understand what lies ahead,” Mr Boress explained.

Worksite health centers can help to streamline the fragmented treatment process, support adherence to therapy, and assist with nutritional counseling, fitness, and coping strategies. Following treatment, centers can assist employees returning to function.

The ability of worksite health centers to implement these strategies can make cancer therapy more tolerable for employees and more economical for employers.

Related Items
Hypermobility Syndrome Underrecognized, Requires Team-Based Management
Wayne Kuznar
VBCR - October 2016, Vol 5, No 5 published on November 2, 2016 in Rheumatic Diseases
Neuropathies in Rheumatic Diseases Encompass Wide Spectrum of Diagnoses
Wayne Kuznar
VBCR - October 2016, Vol 5, No 5 published on November 2, 2016 in Rheumatic Diseases
Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Cite Improvements in Pain, Quality of Life as Treatment Goals
Wayne Kuznar
VBCR - October 2016, Vol 5, No 5 published on November 2, 2016 in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Celecoxib Demonstrates Better Results than Acetaminophen in Patients with Low Back Pain
Wayne Kuznar
VBCR - August 2016, Vol 5, No 4 published on August 25, 2016 in Back Pain
Entrectinib Shows Strong Activity Against a Range of Rare Solid Tumors with Molecular Abnormalities
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - June 2016, Vol 7, No 5 published on June 17, 2016 in Emerging Therapies
Promising Antitumor Activity of ODM-201 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - June 2016, Vol 7, No 5 published on June 17, 2016 in Emerging Therapies
Updated NCCN Guideline Calls for EGFR Mutations Testing in All Patients with NSCLC
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - June 2016, Vol 7, No 5 published on June 17, 2016 in Lung Cancer
Minor Changes in Systemic Therapy Recommendations in NCCN Breast Cancer Guideline
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - June 2016, Vol 7, No 5 published on June 17, 2016 in Breast Cancer
Nivolumab Monotherapy Prolongs Survival in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - June 2016, Vol 7, No 5 published on June 17, 2016 in Melanoma
NCCN Panel Examines Impact of the Presidential Election on Cancer Care
Wayne Kuznar
VBCC - May 2016, Vol 7, No 4 published on June 3, 2016 in NCCN Conference Highlights
Last modified: July 1, 2014
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME
  • American Health & Drug Benefits
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Myeloma
  • Value-Based Care in Neurology