Future Anti-HER2 Therapy Likely to be Costly

VBCC - Other
Caroline Helwick

San Antonio—It turns out that for women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer,  treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin)—which cuts the risk of recurrence by half—may be just the beginning.

At the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, several key studies evaluated “combined HER2 blockade,” showing impressive outcomes in the preoperative (neoadjuvant) setting. In these studies, rates of pathological complete response (pCR)—which means that tumors not only shrink but tumor cells become undetectable—exceeded 50%. The studies used various combinations of trastuzumab, lapatinib, and pertuzumab, a novel monoclonal antibody akin to trastuzumab.

“Photo by © SABCS/Todd Buchanan 2010”Neil Spector, MD, director of Translational Oncology Research at the Duke Cancer Institute in North Carolina, remarked that, “Combinations of targeted drugs is the future of oncology. This is a very exciting area. We have gone from HER2-overexpressing disease being the most lethal type of breast cancer to a subtype that we are talking about curing.”  

“Photo by © SABCS/Todd Buchanan 2010”In the 4-arm NeoSphere trial, triple therapy with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel produced 50% more pCRs (46%) than were achieved with other doublets. In addition, the completely “chemotherapy-free” combination of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab eradicated tumors in 17%, leading investigator Luca Gianni, MD, of Milan, to suggest a subset of patients might benefit from targeted therapy minus the more toxic chemotherapy.  In the NeoALLTO trial, treatment with trastuzumab plus lapatinib (Tykerb), given with paclitaxel, produced a 51% pCR rate compared with 25% for lapatinib and 29% for trastuzumab.

Moving Beyond Trastuzumab
What is clear is that other agents targeting the HER2 protein are needed, beyond trastuzumab. Although trastuzumab is highly effective, in the advanced disease setting patients generally develop resistance to the drug within 1 year.

“But HER2 is still a relevant target, once this happens, since HER2 over-expression is still maintained,” Dr Spector said in a plenary lecture. “In fact, patients who have tumor progression on HER2 targeted therapies benefit from continued HER2 blockade.”

Using the agents that were evaluated in these trials, Dr Spector acknowledged that cost would be very high with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, higher yet with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and essentially unimaginable should the 3 drugs be combined.

He remarked that “if money were abundant” he would like to use trastuzumab, lapatinib, and pertuzumab together, as they “act differently but at the same target.”

“But in doing so we would bust the economy, and I can’t imagine this will go over well with payers,” he said. “If only 5 of 100 patients can afford this blockade, we will need to rethink this approach.”

“Photo by © SABCS/Todd Buchanan 2010”Jose Baselga, MD, codirector of the Massachusetts General Cancer Institute, Boston, said at a press conference, “No question, the cost of these therapies will be higher, but you have to put this in context with the therapeutic benefit, with the fact that many more patients will not require treatment for disease recurrence. This is a sea change in how we explore these therapies.”

More anti-HER2 combinations will be evaluated, Dr Spector said in his presentation, including trastuzumab paired with novel agents targeting PI3-kinase, mTOR, insulin growth factor receptor, and heat shock protein 90. The immunoconjugate TDM-1 is also highly promising.

He predicted the most affordable approach may be anti-HER2 vaccines, which essentially generate trastuzumab and pertuzumab-like antibodies directly in patients.  Laboratory experiments now underway have shown that a HER2 vaccine plus lapatinib significantly diminished tumor volume. If this pans out, complete HER2 blockade would become “more affordable and therefore more accessible” to the 30% or so of breast cancer patients with this subtype.

Related Items
Can Some Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Stop Treatment?
Caroline Helwick
Web Exclusives published on August 30, 2017 in Multiple Sclerosis
Oral Ozanimod: A Safer Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator?
Caroline Helwick
Web Exclusives published on June 26, 2017 in Multiple Sclerosis
Vitamin D Supplementation Shows Benefits in Multiple Sclerosis, but Questions Remain
Caroline Helwick
Web Exclusives published on March 31, 2017 in Multiple Sclerosis
Ocrelizumab Receives Breakthrough Therapy for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Caroline Helwick
VBCN - April 2016 Volume 3, No 1 published on May 3, 2016 in Multiple Sclerosis
Ozanimod Achieves Very Low Relapse Rate in MS
Caroline Helwick
VBCN - April 2016 Volume 3, No 1 published on May 3, 2016 in Multiple Sclerosis
Stem-Cell Transplantation Shows Promise in Multiple Sclerosis, but Major Concerns Remain
Caroline Helwick
VBCN - April 2016 Volume 3, No 1 published on May 3, 2016 in Multiple Sclerosis
Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis Explored by Cost-Effectiveness
Caroline Helwick
VBCR - June 2015, Volume 4, No 3 published on June 29, 2015 in Psoriatic Arthritis
Treatment Outcomes and Cost Assessed for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Caroline Helwick
VBCR - June 2015, Volume 4, No 3 published on June 29, 2015 in Lupus
Ankylosing Spondylitis Treatment Costs Assessed
Caroline Helwick
VBCR - June 2015, Volume 4, No 3 published on June 29, 2015 in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Patients with Myeloma Satisfied with Their Care but Feel Unprepared to Discuss Treatment Choices
Caroline Helwick
Value-Based Care in Myeloma published on February 26, 2015 in Multiple Myeloma
Last modified: May 28, 2014
  • Rheumatology Practice Management
  • Lynx CME
  • American Health & Drug Benefits
  • Value-Based Cancer Care
  • Value-Based Care in Myeloma
  • Value-Based Care in Neurology